Examining the Effect of Algorithmic Hiring, Perceived Fairness, and HR Tech Literacy on Recruitment Acceptance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1106Keywords:
Algorithmic Hiring, Recruitment Acceptance, Perceived Fairness, HR Tech Literacy, Human Resource TechnologyAbstract
The increasing integration of algorithmic technologies in recruitment processes has raised questions about candidate acceptance and perceptions of fairness. This study examines the effects of algorithmic hiring, perceived fairness, and HR tech literacy on recruitment acceptance. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 350 job applicants through structured questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression via SPSS. The results reveal that all three variables—algorithmic hiring, perceived fairness, and HR tech literacy—significantly and positively affect recruitment acceptance. Among them, perceived fairness emerged as the strongest predictor, suggesting that candidates’ perceptions of just and transparent processes play a critical role in shaping their acceptance of technology-driven recruitment methods. Additionally, HR tech literacy facilitates understanding and comfort with algorithmic systems, enhancing candidate receptivity. The findings contribute to theories of technology acceptance and organizational justice and provide practical implications for designing inclusive, ethical, and effective tech-based recruitment systems. This study underscores the importance of balancing innovation with fairness and transparency to build trust and improve outcomes in digital recruitment.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Al Assadi, A. (2024). A study examining the willingness of recruiters to adopt AI based recruitment system. University of Warwick.
Bankins, S., Formosa, P., Griep, Y., & Richards, D. (2022). AI decision making with dignity? Contrasting workers’ justice perceptions of human and AI decision making in a human resource management context. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 857–875.
Cai, F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence replacing humans in making human resource management decisions on fairness: A case of resume screening. Sustainability, 16(9), 3840.
Calluso, C., & Devetag, M. G. (2024). The impact of technology acceptance and personality traits on the willingness to use AI-assisted hiring practices. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
Choung, H., Seberger, J. S., & David, P. (2024). When AI is perceived to be fairer than a human: Understanding perceptions of algorithmic decisions in a job application context. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(22), 7451–7468.
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023). Ethical perceptions of AI in hiring and organizational trust: The role of performance expectancy and social influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(1), 179–197.
Fleiß, J., Bäck, E., & Thalmann, S. (2024). Mitigating algorithm aversion in recruiting: A study on explainable AI for conversational agents. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 55(1), 56–87.
Fowle, A. (2023). Examining Trust in AI-enabled recruitment.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson College division. Person: London, UK.
Hilliard, A., Guenole, N., & Leutner, F. (2022). Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 940456.
Horodyski, P. (2023). Applicants’ perception of artificial intelligence in the recruitment process. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 100303.
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethics of AI-enabled recruiting and selection: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 977–1007.
Kelan, E. K. (2024). Algorithmic inclusion: Shaping the predictive algorithms of artificial intelligence in hiring. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(3), 694–707.
Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(3), 795–848.
Lavanchy, M., Reichert, P., Narayanan, J., & Savani, K. (2023). Applicants’ fairness perceptions of algorithm-driven hiring procedures. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 125–150.
Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718756684.
Mihaljević, H., Müller, I., Dill, K., Yollu-Tok, A., & von Grafenstein, M. (2024). More or less discrimination? Practical feasibility of fairness auditing of technologies for personnel selection. AI & SOCIETY, 39(5), 2507–2523.
Ochmann, J., Michels, L., Tiefenbeck, V., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2024). Perceived algorithmic fairness: An empirical study of transparency and anthropomorphism in algorithmic recruiting. Information Systems Journal, 34(2), 384–414.
Powell, J. R. (2024). Human Resource Professionals’ Perceptions of Trust in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Hiring Software. National University.
Revillod, G. (2024). Why Do Swiss HR Departments Dislike Algorithms in Their Recruitment Process? An Empirical Analysis. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 253.
Robinson, M. F. (2019). Artificial intelligence in hiring: Understanding attitudes and perspectives of HR practitioners. Wilmington University (Delaware).
Rodgers, W., Murray, J. M., Stefanidis, A., Degbey, W. Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2023). An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100925.
Shulner-Tal, A., Kuflik, T., & Kliger, D. (2023). Enhancing fairness perception–Towards human-centred AI and personalized explanations understanding the factors influencing laypeople’s fairness perceptions of algorithmic decisions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(7), 1455–1482.
Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022). Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221115188.
Tanantong, T., & Wongras, P. (2024). A UTAUT-based framework for analyzing users’ intention to adopt artificial intelligence in human resource recruitment: a case study of Thailand. Systems, 12(1), 28.
Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Malik, A., Budhwar, P., & Kaur, P. (2025). Exploring the duality of perceptions: Insights into uncertainties, aversion and appreciation towards algorithmic HRM. Human Resource Management, 64(2), 583–616.
Wang, R., Harper, F. M., & Zhu, H. (2020). Factors influencing perceived fairness in algorithmic decision-making: Algorithm outcomes, development procedures, and individual differences. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.
Yarger, L., Cobb Payton, F., & Neupane, B. (2020). Algorithmic equity in the hiring of underrepresented IT job candidates. Online Information Review, 44(2), 383–395.
Yu, J., Ma, Z., & Zhu, L. (2025). The configurational effects of artificial intelligence-based hiring decisions on applicants’ justice perception and organisational commitment. Information Technology & People, 38(2), 553–581.
Zhang, L., & Yencha, C. (2022). Examining perceptions towards hiring algorithms. Technology in Society, 68, 101848.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
