Criminalization of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Behavior in Indonesia from the Perspectives of Maqashid Shari'ah and Utilitarianism

Authors

  • Badrus Zaman Al Fikri Universitas Brawijaya
  • Nur Chanifah Universitas Brawijaya
  • Setiawan Noerdajasakti Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1137

Keywords:

Criminalization; LGBT; Maqashid Syari'ah; Utilitarianism; Criminal Law.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the formulation of legal regulation for the criminalization of LGBT sexual behaviour in Indonesia through the perspectives of Maqashid Syari'ah and Utilitarianism. In a country with a Muslim-majority population, the LGBT phenomenon frequently raises a conflict between human rights protection and religious values. Using a normative juridical approach, this study examines legislation, legal theories, and relevant secondary data. Findings indicate that there is no explicit national regulation criminalizing LGBT behaviour. The Maqashid Syari'ah perspective emphasizes the protection of five fundamental principles: religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. Meanwhile, Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism asserts that legal policy should maximize societal benefit. The study concludes that integrating these two approaches provides a balanced foundation for criminal policy formulation that upholds moral values and public interest without compromising justice and human rights.

References

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Bentham, J. (2007). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Duignan, B. (2024). Utilitarianism. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved May 19, 2025, from [https://www.britannica.com/topic/utilitarianism-philosophy](https://www.britannica.com/topic/utilitarianism-philosophy )

Fitrianto, T. E. (2019). Penerapan Undang-Undang No. 44 Tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi terhadap Penangkapan Pelaku Hubungan Sejenis (Gay). Jurnal Juris-Diction, 2 (5), 1864.

Ghazali, A. H. Al-. (2005). Al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamalludin, I., Zulfikri, M., & Juwita, R. (2018). Politik hukum dalam kebijakan hukum pidana LGBT. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 6 (2), 317–342.

Karnadi, R. D., & Harahap, A. (2016). LGBT di Indonesia: Perspektif hukum Islam, HAM, psikologi dan pendekatan maslahah. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 26 (2), 223–224.

Kenedi, J. (2017). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam sistem penegakan hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2016). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Oetomo, D. (2001). Memberi suara pada yang bisu. Yogyakarta: Galang Press.

Putri, A. H., & Hutapea, R. (2022). Risiko infeksi menular pada homoseksual. Jurnal Kedokteran Anatomica, 5 (1), 15.

Redi, A. (2017). Hukum pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ridlwan, Z. (2012). Negara hukum Indonesia kebalikan Nachtwachterstaat. Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5 (2), 145.

Sidi, R., Nurhidayat, R., & Basri, H. (2021). Staatfundamentalnorm (Pancasila) sebagai bahan pembaharuan sistem hukum. Juris Studia, 2 (3), 511.

Simonsen, C. E., & Gordon, K. J. (2017). Criminal justice in America (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Soesilo, R. (2013). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta komentar-komentarnya lengkap pasal demi pasal (15th ed.). Bogor: Politeia.

Syatibi, A. I. (2003). Al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Syari’ah (Vol. II). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Al Fikri, B. Z., Chanifah, N., & Noerdajasakti, S. (2025). Criminalization of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Behavior in Indonesia from the Perspectives of Maqashid Shari’ah and Utilitarianism. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 6(1), 968 - 975. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1137